Comments on: Transrotor JR Tamino MC Cartridge https://positive-feedback.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/transrotor-jr-tamino-mc-cartridge/ A Creative Forum for the Audio Arts Sun, 03 Dec 2017 18:55:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: stuart https://positive-feedback.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/transrotor-jr-tamino-mc-cartridge/#comment-1947 Sun, 03 Dec 2017 18:55:00 +0000 http://positive-feedback.com/?p=20536#comment-1947 In reply to PositiveFeedbackDiscussions.

But is the 0.5mV output quoted measured at 3.54cm/sec (as often used by Japanese companies) or the more common 5.cm/sec please?
[email protected]/sec equates to 0.7mV@5cm/sec which seems to be unusually high. I would have thought most people considering a new cartridge at this exalted price level would own a phono stage more suited to a lower signal output. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks Stuart

]]>
By: PositiveFeedbackDiscussions https://positive-feedback.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/transrotor-jr-tamino-mc-cartridge/#comment-1848 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 23:12:00 +0000 http://positive-feedback.com/?p=20536#comment-1848 In reply to Bill K.

Thanks for catching that. Have made the correction in the text to match the specifications.

]]>
By: Bill K https://positive-feedback.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/transrotor-jr-tamino-mc-cartridge/#comment-1847 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 23:05:00 +0000 http://positive-feedback.com/?p=20536#comment-1847 In the third paragraph of the review text you state: "it is said to deliver powerful 0.5 μV to the phono preamp", however according to the specs I believe you meant 0.5 mV (instead of microvolts).

]]>